The Current Sad State of Formula 1

Watching an F1 car chase down the car in front can be exciting, but that was before DRS (the Artificial, temporary, Drag Reduction, that adds speed to overtake on “DRS enabled” straightaways), and Blue flags, waved to let the leaders pass slower and lapped cars. What are the rule makers thinking? Don’t they like real racing?

Today’s Austrian Grand Prix was as boring a race as I have ever seen. And I have been watching F1 since the late 1960’s. Getting excited about a car catching another car for a fierce “battle”, only to see the DRS “cheat sheet” flap open to end it , is very disappointing! No more need for racecraft to pass the guy in front! How can this be F1?

And then there are the ridiculous tire change rules, made to break up the race, and add the chance of a mistake, by the team or driver, during the pit stop. For a number of years they were also putting in more fuel, splitting the race into short sprints between stops, creating racing that has become artificial, unnecessary, dangerous, and boring! Who cares that 50 people can change four tires in under 3 seconds? Save it for the end-of-year team competitions!

Stop the idiot “shoot out” qualifying! Does anyone remember when we used to have two separate hours of it, on Friday and Saturday, with everyone on the track? Today’s farce is a show for the TV directors. I guess it was too hard for them to follow the action with the old system? If they are going to make it artificial, then copy Indianapolis, and let one car on the track at a time. Today’s three-part Qualifying is totally boring, predictable, and stupid!

Let’s try one race, run to the pre-1996 rule changes? Proper, all or nothing, two hour qualifying. No DRS. No forced tire change/pit stop. Start and finish the race on the track, unless something goes wrong, and a car needs repairs.

We could even go back to 1950’s Formula one, where drivers were allowed to change cars with their team mates, if their own car had problems! Now that was team work!

The most annoying part of it all, is that today’s drivers are compared to yesterdays drivers, as far as wins, poles, fastest laps, and even points (what?). How can today’s racers be compared to yesterdays when the rules are such a joke! How many races would Senna have won if he didn’t have to pass any “back markers” or had DRS? Frightening! Welcome to the 21st century, where everyone is a winner and the rest are “real losers”!

JJ at Silverstone 1991, with Alan Prost getting in his Ferrari

Speed Kings of Santa Monica

The 8.4 mile Santa Monica Road Racing Track 1909-1919

The Speed Kings was a Keystone Film Company production starring Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle, and Mabel Normand. It was filmed during the 1913 Santa Monica Road Race, with real racing drivers, Barney Oldfield, Earl Cooper, and Teddy Tetzlaff, playing themselves!

The 90-degree left hander, from San Vicente to Ocean.

The anti-clockwise track started and finished on Ocean Boulevard, where the huge grandstands faced the road and the Pacific Ocean. Turn 1 was a left turn at today’s Wilshire Boulevard, then named Nevada, for Senator John P. Jones, Santa Monica’s founder. The cars followed Nevada east until the Old Soldier’s Home, and then turned back through Brentwood on San Vicente, until reaching the final turn at Ocean Boulevard, and completing an 8.4 mile loop.

The Santa Monica Road Race was held in 1909, 1911-1916, and 1919.

The Virtues of Vegetarianism (1900 Los Angeles)

A fascinating read, from  1900, by G. M. TOWNSEND, in the Los Angeles Herald newspaper, promoting the Hygienic Vegetarian  restaurant on Third Street, between Hill and Broadway, in downtown Los Angeles.

THE VIRTUES OF VEGETARIANISM

Furnishes All the Nourishment of Meat Without Its Poisons—Beneficial Effects on the Temperament

THE VEGETARIAN RESTAURANT TABLES SPREAD WITH THE APPETIZING FOODS IN WHICH THE NON-EATER OF MEATS DELIGHTS

Is vegetarianism merely a passing fad, or have Its theories a rational basis in fact? Let any one put this question to one of the 400 or more vegetarians of this city, and he will learn that if this doctrine of living is a passing fad it has been a long time passing. The followers of Buddha have been for over 2,500 years strict vegetarians, for the prohibition against the killing of animals is one of the foremost of the doctrines taught by Buddha. Among the ancient philosophers of Greece and Rome, Pythagoras, Hesiod, Socrates, Plutarch, Seneca, were all believers in and teachers of the doctrine that man should live on vegetable food alone. The belief is certainly oid enough to be entitled to consideration.

This movement in modern times was started early in the present century, and among those who have advocated it may be found many names of prominence in the scientific and literary world. Shelley, Gray, Pope, Milton. Rousseau, Laniartine, Buffon, Schopenhauer, were all opposed to the eating of flesh.

Vegetarianism was one of the principles dominant in the well remembered “Brook Farm” experiment, which numbered among it participants such familiar names as Emerson, Hawthorne, Thoreau, Horace Greeley, Charles Dana, Margaret Fuller, Bronson Alcott.

It is commonly held by those opposed to vegetarianism that entire abstinence from a meat diet always results, to a greater or less extent, in loss of vitality and power of endurance, and a consequent lessening of mental energy.

The vegetarians, in reply to this, say that every element of nutrition that we require in our foods comes either directly or indirectly from the vegetable kingdom, and that in eating animal food we are really obtaining these elements at second hand, and in a more or les deteriorated condition than if direct from vegetables, cereals, fruits and nuts; that a rational vegetarian diet properly varied, so as to combine in right proportion those food elements required by the system, will supply all the needed nourishment without the poisonous elements contained in meat. It is also hefd that : the increased strength that we think we get from the use of animal food is to a certain extent, but, of course, not entirely so, merely a nerve stimulation caused by the poisons of decomposing meat, analagous to the nerve stimulation caused by alcohol, tobacco and drugs. The vegetarians further bring forward as an argument for abstinence from a flesh diet the spread of disease among domestic animals used for food, of which tuberculosis among cattle is an example, and, as is well known, is one of the most potent causes of tuberculosis in the human race.

It is a familiar truth that in America the common people eat very much more meat than in any other country in the world, and it is commonly said by physicians that stomach trouble, digestive disorders and dyspepsia are far more prevalent here than in any other country; that in fact we are sometimes called a nation of dyspeptics.

Regarding the question as to whether a vegetarian diet will give sufficient nourishment to one who is under a great physical strain, it is worthy of note that Miller, Gimm and Aronson, men who have all achieved prominence in sixday bicycle races, were all trained on a purely vegetable diet.

The effect of a vegetarian diet as opposed to a meat diet on the temperament is a subject offering much In the way of discussion. It is a generally conceded fact that stimulants of all sorts tend directly toward exciting the baser passions and animal instincts, and have’a deteriorating effect on the higher faculties. A vegetarian diet, plain, simple, non-stimulating, but nourishing, tends to produce a more normal condition of mind as well as body.

Among other desirable effects on temperament claimed for this mode of living is that it very materially lessons nervousness and irritability by removing the nerve stimulation and consequent reaction which accompanies a flesh dietary.

Two prominent English physicians, T. Lander Brunton and the late Sir Benjamin Ward Richardson, have given much attention to diet in its relation to alcoholism, and say positively that they believe the seeds of a large amount of intemperance are sown by feeding growing children on stimulating food, thus causing abnormal irritation of the mucous membrane of the stomach, and loading up to a desire for stimulants of a stronger nature.

Possibly the best argument of all for a vegetarian diet will be afforded by a visit to the Vegetarian Hygienic restaurant in this city, where one may see the practical result of this doctrine. The restaurant itself is an attractive place, neat and well appointed, and you cannot help being favorably Impressed. As you look about at the people assembled there, handsome young women, robust, healthy looking men, and well preserved old men and women, you will admit that they look as healthy and well nourished as any gathering of flesh eaters. Another point in which the observer is favorably impressed is in the refined and thoughtful appearance these people as a whole present, and the entire absence of the undesirable elements of the community.

From considerations of economy there is much to be said in favor of vegetarianism. When one considers the variety and quality of food, and the service obtainable for a sum less than one pays for a very ordinary dinner elsewhere, the comparison is very much in favor of the menu of the vegetarian restaurant, of which the following is a fair sample:

The Hygienic Vegetarian  restaurant menu

Surely in no place in the world are conditions more favorable (or the spread of this movement than here in Southern California, with its perfect climate, where fruit and vegetables reach the highest state of perfection and are to be had from one year’s end to the other at prices which place them within the means of every one. It is reasonable to suppose that the vegetarian mode of living may become very popular here when people become more familiar with the appetizing meals which can be prepared from purely vegetable materials.

The leaders in this movement are the International Medical Missionary and Benevolent association, having establishments in various parts of the world, one of the largest of which is at Rattle Creek, Mich. There are also local associations in various states and foreign countries, each having supervision over the work of its own particular district. All these associations are incorporated, and it is a point worthy of notice that accordirg to the articles of incorporation no individual draws any profits or dividends, but all profits are applied to extending the movement, of which the object is the cure of disease and the disseminating of the principles of healthful and hygienic living.

The sanitarium and restaurant on Third street, which is under the management of Dr. F. B. Moran is conducted under the supervision of the California branch of the association.
G. M. TOWNSEND.

Los Angeles Herald 1900

The Hygienic Vegetarian Restaurant (1900)